Rejected Bouncy Buildings - Map submission - by: Damimar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Posts
2
#1
Username: Damimar
Map name: Bouncy Buildings
Plot ID: -59;-126
Difficulty: Medium (it may be hard, but I chose medium)
Number of jumps: around 70-80

There is an extra bit of parkour under the first island which leads to a cake room. It gives no advantage and it's not a shortcut. It's just a passage to the cake room.

Images:
image for map submission.png
image 2 for map submission.png
 

Acrellux

Forum God
ELITE
Acrellux
Acrellux
ELITE
Joined
Jul 28, 2020
Posts
5,050
Ratings
1,364 146
#3
Hi! I have a bit of feedback to give you.
So first of all, the jumps are repetitive, ladders, water jumps, blocks and heads. Try to add more types of blocks to vary the parkour up.
Second of all, the builds don't look amazing, they could have some work.
Third, this would probably get accepted as an Expert, for there are too many jumps for a medium.

Now, for some flaws.

This entire part can be skipped 1614794550496.png

You can jump to different fences using the ladders 1614793531479.png

This ladder allows this parkour 1614794550496.png to be entirely skipped, and since there isn't another way to get onto the ceiling (the parkour 1614794550496.png is not accessible from the floor), it's the only way of continuing. The ladder was hidden and should have been easier to find. 1614793638886.png

Finally, this isn't possible in 1.8.9.

All of these can be fixed easily.

I'm not a map judge so this post won't affect the probability of the acceptance of the map, these are just my opinions. Good luck
 

jacobsfunparty

Forum Expert
ELITE
jacobsfunparty
jacobsfunparty
ELITE
Joined
Apr 15, 2020
Posts
465
Ratings
337 6
#4
Hi! I have a bit of feedback to give you.
So first of all, the jumps are repetitive, ladders, water jumps, blocks and heads. Try to add more types of blocks to vary the parkour up.
Second of all, the builds don't look amazing, they could have some work.
Third, this would probably get accepted as an Expert, for there are too many jumps for a medium.

Now, for some flaws.

This entire part can be skipped View attachment 44910

You can jump to different fences using the ladders View attachment 44905

This ladder allows this parkour View attachment 44910 to be entirely skipped, and since there isn't another way to get onto the ceiling (the parkour View attachment 44910 is not accessible from the floor), it's the only way of continuing. The ladder was hidden and should have been easier to find. View attachment 44906

Finally, this isn't possible in 1.8.9.

All of these can be fixed easily.

I'm not a map judge so this post won't affect the probability of the acceptance of the map, these are just my opinions. Good luck
The jump into the hole is possible. You just need to jump instead of walk off.
 

Elly_x

Forum God
ELITE
Elly_x
Elly_x
ELITE
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Posts
1,867
Ratings
557 20
#5
Hello Damimar,
I regret to inform you that your map is being rejected.

There isn't really a concrete THEME so next time try and base your build around a solid theme such as like a cartoon character or a landmark like a lighthouse.

The BUILD is alright. The green building just looks a little plain and more detail could be added to improve it. You did a good job building the parkour around and inside the buildings keeping everything nice and neat. The build doesn't really correspond with any sort of theme and was poorly executed which is the main issue.

The PARKOUR was alright. The jumps themselves fit the medium difficulty but the length of it did not. 80 jumps fits more into the expert difficulty than the medium. The main issue was the pathing, it was very confusing trying to figure out where to go. What could fix this is minimizing the amount of barriers used as well as more directional signs/heads directing people in the right direction.

Thank you for submitting a map. Good luck on your future submissions. [Jacob]
If you have any questions, feel free to message me on discord at Elly#5555
Have a great day,
Elly
 
Status
Not open for further replies.