When we define a "good" moderator, we generally prioritize these ideals: efficient strategies to defuse arguments, a fair and just way of disciplining individuals for breaking rules, knowing when to stop a conversation before it goes too far and so on. I have not seen any of the moderators presenting these ideals.
This past week has had multiple incidents involving politics, racism, sexism and so on. Now, as expected of a normal server with mods these situations SHOULD have been defused efficiently, resulting in a satisfying conclusion for both ends of the argument whether its a mute or a warning to move on and change the topic. In my time of playing on the Parkour server, I have witnessed at least 10 of these incidents, all of which have gone on for too long and has started to spark insults and major arguments involving quite a number of participants. This is clearly a high number of incidents considering my short time of playing on the server and is extremely embarrassing; we need to address this.
There should be a standard and a set of guidelines that should be fulfilled when selecting a moderator, such as experience, activeness and their abilities. Unfortunately, for all of the moderators that have been put up to the test (incidents such as above) they have proved to be inadequate and absolutely inefficient.
Starting off, the moderator generally tells the incident partakers to change the topic, this happens for at least SIX TIMES before they actually start to make a move on it, and by then most of the incidents have gone on for too long and has resulted in a major argument. The moderator then proceeds to an abrupt conclusion by muting at least one side of the incident partakers; proving to be inefficient and resulting in more arguments over a period of time.
These moderators are ABSOLUTELY inefficient at fulfilling their role, and this applies majorly to the Chat-moderators who have proven to be extremely incapable of fulfilling out what their position is required to fulfill.
Personally, I believe that most of the moderator population in this server merely has their title because they want to have a position of power over the community, and do not actually wish to fulfill their role efficiently at least. This has to change.
This past week has had multiple incidents involving politics, racism, sexism and so on. Now, as expected of a normal server with mods these situations SHOULD have been defused efficiently, resulting in a satisfying conclusion for both ends of the argument whether its a mute or a warning to move on and change the topic. In my time of playing on the Parkour server, I have witnessed at least 10 of these incidents, all of which have gone on for too long and has started to spark insults and major arguments involving quite a number of participants. This is clearly a high number of incidents considering my short time of playing on the server and is extremely embarrassing; we need to address this.
There should be a standard and a set of guidelines that should be fulfilled when selecting a moderator, such as experience, activeness and their abilities. Unfortunately, for all of the moderators that have been put up to the test (incidents such as above) they have proved to be inadequate and absolutely inefficient.
Starting off, the moderator generally tells the incident partakers to change the topic, this happens for at least SIX TIMES before they actually start to make a move on it, and by then most of the incidents have gone on for too long and has resulted in a major argument. The moderator then proceeds to an abrupt conclusion by muting at least one side of the incident partakers; proving to be inefficient and resulting in more arguments over a period of time.
These moderators are ABSOLUTELY inefficient at fulfilling their role, and this applies majorly to the Chat-moderators who have proven to be extremely incapable of fulfilling out what their position is required to fulfill.
Personally, I believe that most of the moderator population in this server merely has their title because they want to have a position of power over the community, and do not actually wish to fulfill their role efficiently at least. This has to change.